PL EN
 
2/2023 vol. 16
Stats
CC-BY 4.0
Get citation
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
RESILIENCE MECHANISMS OF THE EUROPEAN TRADE NETWORK DURING THE PANDEMIC
Ioana Manafi 1
,
 
Dragos Huru 2
,
 
Florin Dobre 3
,
 
Andreea Gabriela Capbun 4
,
 
Mihai Daniel Roman 5
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Economic Informatics and Cybernetics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania
 
2
Faculty of Theoretical and Applied Economy, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania
 
3
Faculty of Accounting and Management Economic Systems,, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania
 
4
Economic Cybernetics and Statistics Doctoral School, Faculty of Cybernetics, Statistics and Economic Informatics,, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania
 
5
Faculty of Cybernetics, Statistics and Economic Informatics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania
 
 
Submission date: 2023-04-25
 
 
Final revision date: 2023-05-15
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-05-16
 
 
Online publication date: 2023-06-29
 
 
Publication date: 2023-06-29
 
 
Corresponding author
Ioana Manafi   

Department of Economic Informatics and Cybernetics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania
 
 
Economic and Regional Studies 2023;16(2):171-185
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2023-0012
 
 
Article (PDF)
References (25)
 
KEYWORDS
European trade
import
export
network analysis
resilience
robustness
 
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
F02
F14
F44
D85
L14
 
TOPICS
International Relations/Trade
 
ABSTRACT
Subject and purpose of work: The economic crisis generated by COVID-19 pandemic was fundamentally different from those of the past, with unforeseen implication on supply-chains and European trade. As the literature regarding pandemic is quite vast we used bibliometric techniques to find the most influential themes and authors. The aim of this paper is to test if cascading failure is possible when shocks arise in European trade. Materials and methods: To characterize the European commerce, network analysis was employed using Eurostat data of imports and exports in the following years: 2018, 2019 and 2020. We used also trade value indices to characterized European trade during the pandemic and Enterprise Survey run by World Bank for in-depth, cross economies comparisons. Results: The results from the network analysis characterize the compactness of the network, showing that the European trade network is characterized by robustness. Conclusions: Cascading failure has a low probability of occurrence.
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Adamowicz, M., Lemanowicz, M. (2013). Concept of Supply Chain Management Against Traditional Understanding of Supplier-Consumer Relations. Economic and Regional Studies, 6(4), 5-18.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Baldwin, R., & Lopez‐Gonzalez, J. (2015). Supply‐chain trade: A portrait of global patterns and several testable hypotheses. The world economy, 38(11), 1682-1721.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Barabási, A. L. (2013). Network science. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371(1987).
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Borgatti, S. P., & Li, X. (2009). On social network analysis in a supply chain context. Journal of supply chain management, 45(2), 5-22.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Brandon‐Jones, E., Squire, B., Autry, C. W., & Petersen, K. J. (2014). A contingent resource‐based perspective of supply chain resilience and robustness. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(3), 55-73.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Butts, C. T. (2008). Social network analysis with SNA. Journal of statistical software, 24, 1-51.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Chen, X., Tan, Z., & Li, S. (2022). Study on the characteristics of international coal trade on complex network. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 1-21.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Eurostat. (2017). Further clarifying the conceptual treatment of physical imports and exports in economy- wide material flow accounts (EW-MFA).
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Filho, F. C,, & Santos, L. A. (2018). Potentialities and limitations of network analysis methodologies: a theoretical model focused on the Social Sciences. Comunicação e sociedade, (33), 199-214.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 35-41.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Goldin, I, Mariathasan M., (2015) The butterfly defect: How globalization creates systemic risks, and what to do about it, Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Haren, P., & Simchi-Levi, D. (2020). How coronavirus could impact the global supply chain by mid-march. Harward Business Review.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Ivanov, D. (2022). Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives— lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Annals of operations research, 319(1), 1411-1431.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Jackson, M. O. (2008). Social and economic networks. Princeton university press.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Lu, H. E., Potter, A., Rodrigues, V. S., & Walker, H. (2018). Exploring sustainable supply chain management: a social network perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Mena, C., Karatzas, A., & Hansen, C. (2022). International trade resilience and the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Research, 138, 77-91.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Newman, M.E.J. (2017). Networks: an introduction, 1st Edition. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Onjewu, AK.E., Hussain, S. & Haddoud, M.Y. (2022). The Interplay of E-commerce, Resilience and Exports in the Context of COVID-19. Inf Syst Front 24.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Paul, S. K., Chowdhury, P., Moktadir, M. A., & Lau, K. H. (2021). Supply chain recovery challenges in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Research, 136, 316-329.
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Sá, M. M. D., Miguel, P. L. D. S., Brito, R. P. D., & Pereira, S. C. F. (2020). Supply chain resilience: the whole is not the sum of the parts. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(1), 92-115.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Scott, J. (1988). Social network analysis. Sociology, 22(1), 109-127.
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Strogatz, S. H. (2001). Exploring complex networks. Nature, 410(6825), 268-276.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
WTO (2020). S.L.: World Trade Organization.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
WBES (2022). World Bank Enterprise Surveys, http://www.enterprisesurveys.o....
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:2451-182X
ISSN:2083-3725
Journals System - logo
Increase in the participation of foreign reviewers in Economic and Regional Studies/ Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne – task financed under the agreement No. 583/P-DUN/2017 by the Minister of Science and Higher Education allocated to the activities of disseminating science.

Digitalization of Economic and Regional Studies/ Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne – task financed under the agreement No. 819/P-DUN/2018 by the Minister of Science and Higher Education allocated to the activities of disseminating science.

© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top