ORIGINAL ARTICLE
THE REVIVAL OF REGIONAL COOPERATION IN CENTRAL ASIA IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF HUNGARY'S EASTERN OPENING POLICY
More details
Hide details
1
Doctoral School of Regional- and Business Administration Sciences, Széchenyi István University, Hungary
2
Central Asia, Hungarian Institute of International Affairs, Hungary
Submission date: 2023-04-29
Final revision date: 2023-05-15
Acceptance date: 2023-05-16
Online publication date: 2023-06-29
Publication date: 2023-06-29
Corresponding author
Peter Barkanyi
Doctoral School of Regional- and Business Administration Sciences, Széchenyi István University, Győr, Hungary
Economic and Regional Studies 2023;16(2):241-256
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Subject and purpose of work: This study explores the specifics of strengthening Central Asian regional cooperation and its potential opportunities according to Hungary's Eastern Opening Policy. Materials and methods: A two-pronged approach was used to conduct this study, which included a comprehensive literature review of relevant academic publications on regional cooperation, as well as an examination of cooperation projects to identify specific characteristics. Results explicated using descriptive methodology for the analysis. Results: Central Asian regional integration differs from the traditional model, emphasizing the importance of historical factors and the strengthening of Turk ethnic identity as a foundation for unification efforts. Conclusions: Foreign economic engagement in Central Asia requires a continuous and assertive presence, along with the development of mutual trust due to the region's unique historical, cultural, and geopolitical context. These tendencies and intentions have been recognised by Hungarian foreign strategy - in line with the Eastern Opening Policy - with good sense and at a good pace.
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Bárkányi, P. (2022). Central Asia from the Perspective of Hungarian Economic Diplomacy. XVII. FIKUSZ 2022 International Conference: Proceedings, pp.571 – 581.
2.
Bernek, Á. (2022): Az eurázsiai középső közlekedési folyosó, vagyis a Transz-Kaszpi Nemzetközi Közlekedési Útvonal jelentőségéről. Eurázsia Központ Elemzések, EK/2022/23. (in Hungarian).
3.
Dragneva, R., Wolczuk, K. (2017) The Eurasian Economic Union: Deals, Rules and the Exercise of Power. Russia and Eurasia Programme Research Paper May.
4.
Dašić, D. (2013) Branding of States and Nations, Culture, no. 139, p. 396-415.
5.
Gleason, A. (2010) Eurasia: What Is It? Is It? Journal of Eurasian Studies, 1, pp. 26–32.
6.
Gupta, P.K. (2023). First Russia-Central Asia Summit: A Reflection of Deep Connect between the Two Regions (
https://www.vifindia.org/2022/...- Connect-between-the-Two-Regions, Accessed: 13.11.2023).
7.
Koishibayev, Y. (2022): Transit and Transport Cooperation between Kazakhstan and the European Union: Prospects for the Development of the Middle Corridor. [Online], Available at (
https://middlecorridor. com/en/press-center/news/the-prospects-for-the-development-of-middle-corridor-were-discussed-inbrussels, Accessed: 21.08.2022).
8.
Lagarde, C. (2019). Uzbekistan’s Reforms: A New Equation for Inclusive Growth and Cooperation (https:// www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2019/05/17/sp051719-lagarde-uzbekistan-reforms-a-new-equation- for-inclusive-growth-and-cooperation, Accessed: 21.08.2022).
9.
Lakatos, A. (2018). Az Új Selyemút geostratégiai és földrajzi dimenziói. Észak-magyarországi Stratégiai Füzetek, 15 (1), pp. 119-120 (in Hungarian).
10.
Malgin, A. B.–Narinskii, M. M. (2002) The Southern Flank of the CIS, Central Asia – the Caspian the Caucasus: Energy policy and politics, Navona Publishing, pp. 32-46.
13.
Papp-Váry, Á.F. (2018). Country branding: what branding? Relevant terminologies and their possible interpretations in the case of countries. Economic and Regional Studies, 11(4), pp. 7-26. (DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-20...).
14.
Rahmanov, A. (2022): Turkmenistan’s Neutral Foreign Policy: Peace, Security and Sustainable Development. PERCEPTIONS, Spring-Summer 2022 Volume XXVII Number 1, pp.137-150.
15.
Shadikhodjaev, S. (2008). Eurasian Economic Community (EurAsEC): Legal Aspects of Regional Trade Integration. East Asian Bureau of Economic Research, Trade Working Papers.
16.
strategy.uz (2022). Five years with action strategy: result of the reforms (
https://strategy.uz/index.php?- news=1478&lang=en, Accessed: 11.08.2022).
17.
Széll KálmánTerv 2.0., (2012) Széll KálmánTerv 2.0. A következő lépés (
https://2010-2014.kormany.hu/ hu/nemzetgazdasagi-miniszterium/hirek/elkeszult-a-szell-kalman-terv-2-0, Accessed: 21.07.2022) in Hungarian.
18.
Szijjártó, P. (2022) Magyarország a „Béke Fórumaként” tekint a Türk Államok Szervezetére (https:// kormany.hu/hirek/magyarorszag-a-beke-forumakent-tekint-a-turk-allamok-szervezetere, Accessed: 23.11.2022. (in Hungarian)).
20.
Vasa, L. (2020): Regionalizmus Közép-Ázsiában. TÉR GAZDASÁG EMBER 3 (8) pp. 27-46 (in Hungarian).
21.
Vasa, L. (2020): A Türk Tanács közép-ázsiai és kaukázusi országai a magyar külgazdaság perspektívájából. KKI-elemzések, E-2021/08. pp. 53-67 (in Hungarian). DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47683/ KKIElemzesek.E-2021.08.