ORIGINAL ARTICLE
TOURIST POTENTIAL AS AN ELEMENT OF COMPETITIVENESS OF RURAL AREAS ON THE EXAMPLE OF SUBCARPATHIAN REGION
More details
Hide details
1
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski
University of Rzeszów
Publication date: 2018-07-11
Corresponding author
Wiesława Kuźniar
dr inż. Wiesława Kuźniar
University of Rzeszów
M. Ćwiklińskiej St. 2, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland
phone: +48 17 872 16 18
Economic and Regional Studies 2013;6(3):97-110
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
In the study, selected aspects were presented concerning the assessment of tourist potential of communes in the context of shaping their competitiveness. Against the background of theoretical considerations one’s own proposal was presented on measurement of tourist potential of rural communes, constituting a modification of the method of G. Gołembski. The changes made by the author result mainly from the specifics of rural areas and technological progress.
The values of measurement factors presented which characterize a tourist attractiveness of communes in Subcarpathian region point out for potentially high possibilities of development of rural tourism. Unfortunately, in the quantity approach the Subcarpathian region is located on a quite high position on a scale in the whole country, this however is a low attractive quality offer which makes that rural tourism is low competitive against the background of other regions. Most often chances of tourist development are ascribed to endogen resources including especially natural and cultural ones. In the meantime, experiences of other regions indicate that the success of a given region depends not only on natural attractions or cultural heritage, but more and more often creativity, ability to cooperate and determination of persons and entities involved in the development of rural tourism.
Among many decisions and activities of strategic and organizational nature, in the opinion of the author on the basis of the research conducted, one may point out six, basic elements which raise tourist competitiveness (so called 6 „P” of rural tourism): social participation, ideas, positioning, partnership, offer package and promotion.
REFERENCES (9)
1.
Drzewiecki M. (1992) Wiejska przestrzeń rekreacyjna, Wydawnictwo Instytutu Turystyki, Warszawa.
2.
Gaczek W., Rukiel Z. (2001) Konkurencyjność regionów a regionalizm ekonomiczny [w:] Polityka regionalna i jej rola w podnoszeniu konkurencyjności regionów, red. M. Klamut, L. Cybulski, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu, Wrocław.
3.
Gołembski G. (2002), Metody stymulowania rozwoju turystyki w ujęciu przestrzennym. Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Poznaniu, Poznań 2002.
4.
Klasik A. (2003) Strategie konkurencyjne polskich regionów [w:] Nowe kierunki badawcze w regionalistyce. Nowe doświadczenia polityki regionalnej, Biuletyn KPZK PAN, z. 204, red. R. Domański, Warszawa.
5.
Kołodziejski J. (1997), Strategia równoważenia rozwoju podstawą koncepcji polityki przestrzennego zagospodarowania kraju „Polska 2000” [w:] Polska przestrzeń a wyzwanie XXI wieku, PAN, Warszawa.
6.
Kurek W. (2007.), Turystyka, PWN, Warszawa.
7.
Kuźniar W. (2013) Aktywność marketingowa gmin i jej oddziaływanie na rozwój turystyki wiejskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, Rzeszów.
8.
Warszyńska J. Jackowski A (1979) Podstawy geografii turyzmu, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
9.
Winiarski B. (1999) Problem konkurencyjności w studiach nad strategią i polityką rozwoju regionalnego [w:] Konkurencyjność regionów, red. M. Klamut, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu, Wrocław.