ORIGINAL ARTICLE
SOCIETY VERSUS THE EFFECTS OF VOLCANIC ACTIVITY ON THE SELECTED ISLANDS
More details
Hide details
1
The University of Warsaw / Uniwersytet Warszawski
Publication date: 2018-07-09
Corresponding author
Maria Wąsowska
mgr Maria Wąsowska, Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, The University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmieście
30, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland; phone: +48 22 552-06-31
Economic and Regional Studies 2015;8(2):85-97
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Volcanism has both positive and negative effects. The limitation of the latter ones is admittedly difficult, however, depending on the strength and frequency of events and opportunities for the communities living in these areas is real, and the steps undertaken by them are varied. Despite the risks of inhabiting the regions of active volcanism these areas are densely populated. In the endangered areas the authorities, supported by scientists, are responsible for the effective management of risk and preparation of evacuation plans, which reduces material losses, and saves the life of the inhabitants. Thus, the question is whether and how the island society living in areas directly threatened by volcanic activity can counteract its negative effects? The article makes reference to the eruptions of located on the islands volcanoes Mont Pelée (Martinique), Soufrière Hills (Montserrat), Pinatubo (Luzon) and Helgafell (Heimaey), Ruapehu (New Zealand) and Santa Barbara (Terceira).
REFERENCES (42)
1.
Auker M.R., Sparks R.S.J., Siebert L., Crosweller H.S. i Ewert J. (2013), A statistical analysis of the global historical fatalities record, Journal of Applied Volcanology, t. 2, z. 2,s. 1-24.
2.
Baran L. (2012), O doniosłości medycyny katastrof i ratunkowej w społeczeństwie ryzyka, Ostry dyżur, 2012, t. 5,z. 3-4, s. 31-35.
3.
Becker J., Smith R., Johnston D., Munro A. (2001), Effects of the 1995-1996 Ruapehu eruptions on communities in central North Island, New Zeland, and people’s perceptions of volcanic hazards after the event, Australian Journal of Disaster and trauma Studies, t. 1
http://trauma.massey.ac.nz/tra... (08.12.2013).
4.
Biernacki W., Bokwa A., Działek J., Padło T. (2009), S połeczności l okalne w obec z agrożeń p rzyrodniczych i klęsk ż ywiołowych, IGiGP UJ, Kraków.
5.
De Boer J.Z., Sanders D.Th. (2002), Volcanoes in Human History The Far-Reaching Effects of Major Eruptions, Princeton University Press, USA.
6.
Davis M.S., Ricci T., Mitchell L.M. (2005), Perceptions of Risk for Volcanic Hazards At Vesuvio and Etna, Italy, Australian Journal of Disaster and trauma Studies, t.1
http://trauma.massey.ac.nz/iss... (08.12.2013).
7.
Decker R.W., Decker B.B. (1991), Mountains of fire The nature of volcanoes, Cambridge University Press, USA.
8.
Domiey-Howes D., Minos-Minopoulos D. (2004), Perceptions of hazard and risk on Santorini, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research t. 137, s. 285-310.
9.
Gaudru H. (2005), Overview of potential impact of eruptions on volcanic islands (Global approach for volcanic risk mitigation), European Volcanological Society, UNISDR scientific advisor for volcanic risk mitigation,
http://www.preventionweb.net /files/5538_overviewpotentialimpact.pdf (14.04.2014).
10.
Gillard J.-C., Dibben C.J.L. (2008), Volcanic risk perception and beyond, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, t. 172, s. 163-169.
11.
Graniczny M., Mizerski W. (2009), Katastrofy przyrodnicze, WN PWN, Warszawa.
12.
Jędrusik M. (2005), Wyspy tropikalne. W poszukiwaniu dobrobytu, WUW, Warszawa.
13.
Jędrusik M., Makowski J., Plit F. (2010), Geografia turystyczna świata Nowe trendy. Regiony turystyczne, WUW, Warszawa.
14.
Kundzewicz Z.W., Matczak P. (2010), Zagrożenia naturalnymi zdarzeniami ekstremalnymi, Nauka nr 4, s. 77-86.
15.
Lisowski A. (1996), Skutki występowania wybranych zagrożeń naturalnych i ich percepcja w Polsce, UW, Warszawa.
16.
Madeja Z. (2014), Warunki przystosowania się ludzi oraz ochrona osób i mienia podczas zarządzania kryzysem wynikającym z zagrożeń przyrodniczych, Zeszyty Naukowe Instytutu Ekonomii i Zarządzania, Koszalin, z. 3, s. 15-46.
17.
Marzocchi W., Newhall Ch., Woo G. (2012), The scientific management of volcanic crises, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 247-248, s. 181-189,
http://www.globalvolcanomodel.... (11.04.2014).
18.
Maślankiewicz K. (1961), Wulkany, PWN, Warszawa.
19.
Paton D., Smith L., Johnston D.M. (2000), Volcanic Hazards: Risk Perception and preparedness, New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 29, 2, s. 86-91.
20.
Paton D., Johnston D., Bebbington M.S., Lai C.-D., Hughton B.F. (2001), Direct and vicarious experience of volcanic hazards: implication for risk perception and adjustment adoption, Australian Journal of Emergency Management 15, 4, s. 58-64.
21.
Philipson G., Sobradelo R., Gottsmann J. (2013), Global volcanic unrest in the 21st century: An analysis of the 1rst decade, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 264, s. 183-196.
22.
Rego I. E., Arroz A. M. (2012), Places of fear and attachment how Azoreans perceive seismic and volcanic risk, Global Journal of Community Psychology Practice, t. 3, z. 4, s. 1-9.
23.
Riezanov I.A. (1986), Wielkie katastrofy w historii Ziemi, PWN, Warszawa.
24.
Rucińska D. (2012), Ekstremalne zjawiska przyrodnicze a świadomość społeczna, WGiSR UW, Warszawa.
25.
Scarth A. (1999), Vulcan’s fury: Man against the Volcano, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, s. 132-167.
27.
Wites T. (2009), Pheripherality of the Kuril Islands – a Development Barrier or a Development Factor?, Asia and Pacific Studies, 6, p. 81-95.
28.
NEA www.nea.is/geothermal/direct-utilization/greenhouses/ (12.02.2010).
38.
Lisbon trade www.lisbon.trade.gov.pl/plregionypt/detail,4821,AUTONOMICZNY_REGION_AZOROW.html (05.01.2014).
39.
BPS www.bps.go.id/tab_sub/view.php?kat=1&tabel=1&id_subyek=12¬ab=1 (05.01.2014).
40.
National Geographic www.national-geographic.pl/artykuly/pokaz/wulkany/3/ (20.04.2014).
41.
Jakarta Post www.jakartapost.com/news/2014/02.07/us100000-worth-assistance-indonesian-displaced-sinabung-eruptions.html (21.04.2014).
42.
MIAVITA www.miavita.brgm.fr (22.04.2014).