Current issue
News
From the Editors June 2022
Invitation
From the Editors September 2022
From the Editors November 2022
From the Editors January 2023
From the Editors March 2023
From the Editors September 2023
From the Editors December 2023
From the Editors September 2024
Archive
About the journal
About us
Focus and Scope
Editorial Team
Open Access Policy
Indexing and points
Contact
Subscription - print version of the journal
Business Model
Ethics statement
REVIEW ARTICLE
Green economic development as the framework for green finance and green investment
1
Postgraduate and Research Division, Instituto Tecnológico José Mario Molina Pasquel y Henríquez, Mexico
2
Instytut Ekonomii i Finansów, SZKOŁA GŁÓWNA GOSPODARSTWA WIEJSKIEGO w WARSZAWIE, Polska
3
Campus Cd. Guzmán, Instituto Tecnológico de México, Mexico
Submission date: 2022-07-19
Final revision date: 2022-08-31
Acceptance date: 2022-09-06
Online publication date: 2022-09-28
Publication date: 2022-09-28
Corresponding author
Joanna Rakowska
Instytut Ekonomii i Finansów, SZKOŁA GŁÓWNA GOSPODARSTWA WIEJSKIEGO w WARSZAWIE, Polska
Instytut Ekonomii i Finansów, SZKOŁA GŁÓWNA GOSPODARSTWA WIEJSKIEGO w WARSZAWIE, Polska
Economic and Regional Studies 2022;15(3):303-321
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Subject and purpose of work: The demonetisation exercise in India aimed to tackle the problems of black money, fake currency, corruption, and terror funding. The drying-up of cash due to demonetisation initially led to a significant increase in digital payment methods. However, large underprivileged informal Indians still prefer cash for their daily needs. The restoration of currency in circulation and increasing cash–to–GDP ratio in the following years questioned the success of digitalisation. Demonetisation has been noted to increase the tax base, tax collection and taxpayers. But this does not compensate for the negative impacts of demonetisation on the economy. Therefore, this paper tries to answer the question whether all of the stated goals will be achieved. Materials and methods: For the purpose of analysis, secondary data were drawn from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) and Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). Results: The study found that, except in certain areas, demonetisation has failed to achieve its claimed key objectives. Only minimal short-term gains have resulted from demonetisation and at the same time, it wreaked havoc and harmed the economy. Conclusions: The efficiency of demonetisation as a strategy for combating black money is still up for dispute. If the government had done its homework before executing demonetisation, all of the mayhem could have been avoided. It was a badly thought-out, poorly planned, poorly implemented, and disastrously executed.
REFERENCES (118)
1.
Adamowicz, M., (2022). A green concept of economic growth and development. Economic and Regional Studies, 15(2), 158 – 180. https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-20... (p. 159).
2.
African Development Bank (AfDB). (2014). Green growth Sierra Leone: investing in environmentally sound economic growth. African Development Bank, Tunis (www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/ Project-and-Operations/Sierra_Leone_ _Investing_in_Environmentally_Sound_Economic_Growth.pdf) Accessed 27 June 2016.
3.
Al Mheiri, W., Nobanee, H. (2020). Green Bonds: A Mini-Review. Available at SSRN 3538790.
4.
Alemzero, D.A., Iqbal, N., Iqbal, S., Mohsin, M., Chukwuma, N.J., Shah, B.A. (2021). Assessing the perceived impact of exploration and production of hydrocarbons on households’ perspective of environmental regulation in Ghana. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(5):5359–5371.
5.
Allen, C. (2012). A Guidebook to the Green Economy, Issue 3: Exploring Green Economy Policies and International Experience with National Strategies. UN Division for Sustainable Development.
6.
Al–Sheryani, K., Nobanee, H. (2020). Green Finance: A Mini–Review, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ ssrn.3538696.
7.
Atanasova, N., Castellar, J.A.C., Pineda-Martos, R., Nika, C.E., Katsou, E., Isteniˇc, D., Pucher, B., Andreucci, M.B., Langergraber, G., (2021). Nature-based solutions and circularity in cities. Circ. Econ. Sustain. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021- 00024-1.
9.
Barbier, E. B. (2021). Habitat loss and the risk of disease outbreak, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 108, 102451, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem....
11.
Barnett, M., Darnall, N., Husted, B. (2015). Sustainability Strategy in Constrained Economic Times. Long Range Plan, 48, 63–68.
12.
Baron, R. M., Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 51(6), 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.117.
13.
Batyk, I.M., Farelnik, E., Rakowska, J., Maciejczak, M. (2022). Polish Cittaslow Local Governments’ Support for Renewable Energy Deployment vs. Slow City Concept. Energies, 15(201). https://doi.org/10.3390/ en15010201.
14.
Beaudry, C., Schiffauerova, A. (2009). Who’s Right, Marshall or Jacobs? The Localization versus Urbanization Debate. Res. Pol. 38(2), 318–337. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010.
15.
Bina, O., La Camera, F. (2011). Promise and shortcomings of a green turn in recent policy responses to the ‘double crisis’. Ecological Economics 70, 2308–16.
16.
Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF) (2016b). New energy outlook 2016. London and New York.
17.
Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF). (2016a) Clean energy investment in 2016 undershoots last year’s record Bloomberg, London and New York.
18.
Borel-Saladin, J. M., Turok, I. N. (2013). The green economy: incremental change or transformation? Environmental Policyand Governance 23, 209–20.
19.
Brand, U., (2012). Green economy – The next oxymoron? GAIA - Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 21, 28–32. https:// doi.org/10.14512/gaia.21.1.9.
20.
Brodunov, A. N., Ya, V. (2015). Ushakov, Justification of financial decisions in conditions of uncertainty, Bulletin of the Witte Moscow University. Series 1: Economics and management (12), 30–36.
21.
Buchmann-Duck, J., Beazley, K.F., 2020. An urgent call for circular economy advocates to acknowledge its limitations in conserving biodiversity. Sci. Total Environ. 127, 138602 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. scitotenv.2020.138602.
22.
Bugge, M.M., Hansen, T., Klitkou, A., (2016). What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability 8, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070....
23.
Bunevich, K. G., Petrov, D. M. (2013). Development of dual–use technologies based on the cluster approach, Bulletin of the Witte Moscow University. Economics and management 1(3), 75–79 (2013).
24.
Burkaltseva, D. D., Blazhevich, O. G., Gabrielyan, O. A., Savchenko, L.V., Skorobogatova, T.N., Guk, O.A., Vobk, E.V., Abubakarov, M.A. (2019). Development of the financial security of the state: neutralization of threats, Rev. Incl. 6, 294–312.
25.
Burkaltseva, D. D., Borsch, L. M., Gerasimova, S. V., Zotova, S. A. Guk, O. A. (2018). Regional aspect: laying.institutional groundworks, In: European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Science 50(33), 263–271.
26.
Capasso, M., Hansen, T., Heiberg, J., Klitkou, A., Steen, M. (2019). Green growth – A synthesis of scientific findings. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. techfore.2019.06.013.
27.
Chakravarty, S. R., Pal, R. (2013). Financial Inclusion in India: An Axiomatic Approach. J. Pol. Model. 35(5), 813–837. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2012.12.007.
28.
Charmaz, K. (2009). Teoria Ugruntowana. Praktyczny Przewodnik po Analizie Jakościowej; Wydawnictwo PWN: Warsaw, Poland, 2009.
29.
Cortellini, G., Panetta, I. C. (2021). Green Bond: A Systematic Literature Review for Future Research Agendas. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14 pp. 589. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14....
30.
Cuong, T.T., Sang, L.X., Anh, N.K. (2008). Vietnam’ Small and Medium Sized Enterprises Development: Characteristics, Constraints and Policy Recommendations. In: Lim, H., Ed., SME in Asia, and Globalization, ERIA Research Project Report 2007-5.
31.
Davies, A., Mullin, R., Sue, J. (2010). Greening the economy: interrogating sustainability innovations beyond the mainstream, 11(5), pp. 793, doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq050.
32.
Demirel, P., Parris, S. (2015). Access to finance for innovators in the UK’s environmental sector. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(7), 782–808. https://doi. org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1019849.
33.
Ding, Y., Hu, Y. (2021). Inflection Point of Green Total Factor Productivity by Low-Carbon Regulation from Chinese Economics Recovery. Sustainability, 13(12382). https://doi.org/10.3390/ su132212382.
34.
Drozdowski, G. (2021). Economic Calculus Qua an Instrument to Support Sustainable Development under Increasing Risk. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 14(15).
35.
Egorova, M., Pluzhnic, M., Glik, P., (2015). Global Trends of «Green» Economy Development as a Factor for Improvement of Economical and Social Prosperity, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 166, 194- 198, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsp... S1877042814066476).
36.
European Commission. (2020). Europe 2020: a strategy for smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth, Brussels (http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020... 24 June 2016.
37.
EY Romania. (2021). EY Attractiveness Survey Romania. Available online: https://assets.ey.com/content/ dam/ey-sites/ey-com/ro_ ro/news/2021/ey_attractiveness_survey_en.pdf (accessed on 8 October 2021).
38.
Feng, C., Wang, M., Liu, G.-C., Huang, J.-B. (2017). Green Development Performance and its Influencing Factors: A Global Perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 144(2), 323–333. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.005.
39.
Florea, N.V., Duică, M.C., Ionescu, C.A., Duică, A., Ibinceanu, M.C.O., Stanescu, S.G. (2021). An Analysis of the Influencing Factors of the Romanian Agricultural Output within the Context of Green Economy. Sustainability, 13(9649).
40.
Glaser, B.G.; Strauss, A.L. (2009). Odkrywanie Teorii Ugruntowanej. Strategie Badania Jakościowego; Nomos: Cracov, Poland.
41.
Gu, H., Yan, W., Elahi, E., Cao, Y. (2020). Air Pollution Risks Human Mental Health: An Implication of Two- -Stages Least Squares Estimation of Interaction Effects. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 27(2):2036-2043. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06612-x. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
42.
Gupta, J., Wong, K. Y. (2014) China’s evolving development dilemma in the context of the North–South climate governance debate. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology 13, 699–727.
43.
Hai, N.N., Huy, N.T., Hien, P.M. (2013). Conditions for Green Economy in Vietnam. Workshop Proceeding Green Economy Development based on Interlectual Property Exploitation: Problems Raised, Foreign Trade University, Hanoi, December 2013.
44.
Hamdouch, A., Depret, M. H. (2012). Sustainable Development Policies and the Geographical Landscape of the green economy: Actors, Scales and Strategies. Finisterra 47(94), 49–80. doi:10.18055/Finis2681.
45.
Hansen, B. E. (1999). Threshold Effects in Non-dynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing, and Inference. J. Econom. 93(2), 345–368. doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(99)00025-1.
46.
Hansjürgens, B., 2004. Economic valuation through cost-benefit analysis - possibilities and limitations. Toxicology 205, 241–252.
47.
Hao, D.H. (2014) Industrial Suggestion for Environmental and Economical Protection. http://cantho.gov.vn/ wps/wcm/connect/sotnmt/sub+site/sitemenu/linhvucquanly/linh+vuc+khoa+hoc+cong+nghe/cong +ng he+xanhloi+giai+cho+bai+toan+bao+ve+moi+truong+va+kinh+te.
48.
Henderson, H. (2007). Growing the green economy – globally, Int. J. Green Economics, 1(3/4), pp.276–298.
49.
Hille, E., Shahbaz, M., Moosa, I. (2019). The Impact of FDI on Regional Air Pollution in the Republic of Korea: A Way Ahead to Achieve the green Growth Strategy? Energ. Econ. 81, 308–326. doi:10.1016/j. eneco.2019.04.004.
50.
Jänicke, M., (2012), ‘Green growth’: from a growing eco-industry to economic sustainability Energy Policy 48, 13–21.
51.
Jiang, S., Zhou, X. (2021). Research on the Influence of Digital Inclusive Finance on High-Quality Economic Development. Financ. Forum 26(08), 39–49.
52.
John, H., Marrs, C., Neubert, M., Alberico, S., Bovo, G. (2019). Green infrastructure handbook. Conceptual & Theoretical Background, Terms and Definitions. Technical report DO - 10.13140/RG.2.2.23323.54563.
53.
Kay, J., Silberston, A. (1991). Green Economics. National Institute Economic Review, 135, 50-64. doi:10.1177/002795019113500104.
54.
Khan, J., Johansson, B., Hildingsson, R. (2021). Strategies for greening the economy in three Nordic countries. Environmental Policy and Governance, 31(6), 592–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.19....
55.
Korhonen, J., Nuur, C., Feldmann, A., Birkie, S.E., (2018b). Circular economy as a contested concept. J. Clean. Prod. 175, 544–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
56.
Li, M., Zhang, Y., Fan, Z., Chen, H. (2021). Evaluation and Research on the Level of Inclusive Green Growth in Asia-Pacific Region. Sustainability, 13(7482). https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su13137482.
57.
Licastro, A., Sergi, B.S. (2021). Drivers and Barriers to a Green Economy. A Review of Selected Balkan Countries.Clean. Eng. Technol., 4, 100228.
58.
Liu, N., Liu, C., Xia, Y., Ren, Y., Liang, J. (2020). Examining the Coordination between Green Finance and Green Economy aiming for Sustainable Development: A Case Study of China. Sustainability 12(9), 3717. doi:10.3390/su12093717.
59.
Lockwood, M. (2015). The Political Dynamics of Green Transformations: Feedback Effects and Institutional Context. In The Politics of Green Transformations, pp. 86–101. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
60.
Lombardi, D.R., Laybourn, P., (2012). Redifining industrial symbiosis. Crossing academic practitioner boundaries. J. Ind. Ecol. 16, 28–37,.
61.
Martawardaya, B., Rakatama, A., Junifta, D. Y., Maharani, D. A. (2021). Green economy post COVID-19: insights from Indonesia, Development in Practice, doi: 10.1080/09614524.2021.2002817.
62.
Merino-Saum, A., Clement, J., Wyss, R., Baldi, M.G., (2020). Unpacking the green economy concept: a quantitative analysis of 140 definitions. J. Clean. Prod., 118339, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
63.
Mihai, F., Aleca, O.E., Gogu, E., Dobrin, C., Gheorghe, M. (2021). The Challenges of the Green Economy in Romania. Scientific Literature Review. Sustainability, 13(13113). https://doi.org/10.3390/ su132313113.
64.
Mol A P J, Sonnenfeld D A, Spaargaren G, (2009). The Ecological Modernisation Reader: Environmental Reform in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
65.
Müller, F., Burkhard, B., (2012). The indicator side of ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 1, 26–30. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.001.
66.
National Regional Development Strategy of the Republic of Bulgaria 2012-2022. (2012) https://www.mrrb. bg/bg/national-regional-development-strategy-of-therepublic-of-bulgaria-2012-2022/.
67.
Nguyen, H. (2014). Doanh nghiệp nhỏ và vừa Việt Nam: Tăng sức mạnh “bó đũa”. http://www.vietnamplus. vn/doanh-nghiep-nho-va-vua-viet-nam-tang-suc-manh-bo-dua/260411.vnp.
68.
Nguyen, T.H., Gomi, K., Matsuoka, Y., Tran, T.T., Fujino, J., Kainuma, M., Shreshta, R.M. (2010). Preliminary Study on Sustainable Low-Carbon Development towards 2030 in Vietnam. Asia-Pacific Integrated Model Team, GCOE on Human Security Engineering for Asian Megacities-Kyoto University in Corporation with National Institute for Environmental Studies.
69.
Ni, Y., Chen, B., Wang, Y. (2020). Financial Development, Environmental Regulation and Green Total Factor Productivity: An Empirical Analysis.
70.
Ning, Q. Q., Guo, S. L., Chang, X. Ch. (2021) Nexus between green financing, economic risk, political risk and environment: evidence from China, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. doi: 10.1080/1331677X. 2021.2012710.
71.
Ning, Y., Cherian, J., Sial, M.S., Álvarez-Otero, S., Comite, U., Zia-Ud-Din, M. (2022). Green bond as a new determinant of sustainable green financing, energy efficiency investment, and economic growth: a global perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
72.
Niyazbekova, S., Jazykbayeva, B., Mottaevgreen, A., Beloussova, E., Suleimenova, B., Zueva, A. (2021). The Growth of “Green” finance at the global level in the context of sustainable economic development. E3S Web of Conferences 244(10058). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3scon....
73.
O’Sullivan, M. (2005). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
75.
OECD, (2011). Towards Green Growth: Monitoring Progress; OECD Publishing: Paris, France.
76.
Oh, D.-h. (2010). A Global Malmquist-Luenberger Productivity Index. J. Prod. Anal. 34(3), 183–197. doi:10.1007/s11123-010-0178-y.
77.
Ojo Fafore, E., Aigbavboa, C., Thwala, W., Ramaru, P. (2019). Green Finance for Sustainable Global Growth. doi:10.4018/978–1–5225–7808–6.ch010.
78.
Okuda, H., Aiba, D. (2016). Determinants of Operational Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity Change of Major Cambodian Financial Institutions: A Data Envelopment Analysis During 2006-13. Emerging Markets Finance Trade 52(6), 1455–1471, doi:10.1080/1540496x.2015.1105630.
79.
Onat, N., Bayar, H. (2010). The sustainability indicators of power production systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 14. 3108-3115. 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.022.
80.
Ozili, P. K. (2018). Impact of Digital Finance on Financial Inclusion and Stability. Borsa Istanbul Rev. 18(4), 329–340. doi:10.1016/j.bir.2017.12.003.
81.
Pai, M.K. (2016). The Technical Progress and Resilience in Productivity Growth of Korea’s Growth-Leading Industries. Asian Econ. Pap. 15(2), 167–191.doi:10.1162/asep_a_00441.
82.
Pan, W., Pan, W., Hu, C., Tu, H., Zhao, C., Yu, D., Xiong, J., Zheng, G. (2019). Assessing the Green Economy in China: An Improved Framework. J. Clean. Prod. 209, 680–691. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.267.
83.
Pizzol, M., C.R. Smart, J., Thomsen, M. (2014). External costs of cadmium emissions to soil: a drawback of phosphorus fertilizers. Journal of Cleaner Production 84, 475-483.
84.
Rakowska, J.; Ozimek, I. Renewable Energy Attitudes and Behaviour of Local Governments in Poland. Energies, 14(2765). https://doi.org/10.3390/en1410....
85.
Ren, X., Cheng, C., Wang, Z., Yan, C. (2021). Spillover and dynamic effects of energy transition and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions for the European Union: A dynamic spatial panel model. Sustain. Dev., 29, 228–242.
86.
Ren, X., Lu, Z., Cheng, C., Shi, Y., Shen, J. (2019). On dynamic linkages of the state natural gas markets in the USA: Evidence from an empirical spatio-temporal network quantile analysis. Energy Econ., 80, 234–252.
87.
Ribokene, E. V. (2018). Assessment of the current state of small and medium–sized enterprises in the software development industry, Bulletin of Moscow University. S.Yu. Witte. Series 1: Economics and Management 1(24), 71–80. doi: 10.21777 / 2587–9472–2018–1–71–80.
88.
Robins, N., et al. (2010) Green Austerity Hits the UK. London: HSBC Global Research, Climate Change.
89.
Rudenko, L. G. (2017). Assessment of the possibility of sustainable environmental, social, and economic development of Russia, Bulletin of Moscow University. S. Yu. Witte. Economics and Management 1(20), 20–27. doi: 10.21777 / 2307–6135–2017–1–20–27.
90.
Russo, A., Mariani, M., Caragnano, A. (2021). Exploring the determinants of green bond issuance: going beyond the long-lasting debate on performance consequences. Bus Strateg Environ 30(1), 38–59.
91.
Safargaliev, E., Aetdinova, R., Karimova, A. (2019). Indicators of financial security of small and medium enterprises, Rev. San Gregorio 34, 81–88.
92.
SAGCOT, (2013). A Framework for Agriculture Green Growth: Greenprint for SAGCOT, Dar es Salaam: SAGCOT.
93.
Sapna, D., Nivedita, G. (2019). Effects of Inclusion of Delay in the Imposition of Environmental Tax on the Emission of Greenhouse Gases. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 125, 41–53. doi:10.1016/s0960-0779(19)30214-0.
94.
Schipper, E.L.F., Tanner, T., Dube, O. PAdams, K.M., Huq, S. (2020). The Debate: Is Global Development Adapting to Climate Change? World Development Perspectives 18: 100205.
95.
Silverman, D. (2005). Doing Qualitative Research, 2nd ed.; Sage Publications: London, UK.
96.
Stephenson, J., Upton, S. (2010). Strategies for Green Growth: Framing and Issues. OECD.
97.
Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach. Conclusions and Recommendations, TEEB.
98.
Thuan, N.Q., Trung, N.X. (2012). Green Economy in the Renovation of Growth Model and Restructure of Vietnamese Economy in the Coming Period. Workshop Spring Economic Forum 2012: Vietnam Economy: Aggressive Start-Up for the Restructure of the Economy, The National Assembly Committee, Danang, 7-8 April 2012.
99.
Toppinen, A., D’Amato, D., Stern, T. (2020). Forest-based circular bioeconomy: matching sustainability challenges and novel business opportunities? For. Pol. Econ. 100(102041). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. forpol.2019.102041.
100.
Tuan, B.Q. (2011). Exploitation and Usage of Green Energy in Vietnam. International Conference Proceeding Green Growth Strategy in Korea and Implications for Vietnam, Eastern North of Asia Study Institute.
101.
Tuan, N.A. (2013). Policies and Solutions for Renewable Energy Development in Vietnam. http://www.ievn. com/tin-tuc/Chinh-sach-va-giai-phap-thuc-day-phat-trien-nang-luong-tai-tao-o-viet-nam-5-1029.aspx.
102.
UNEP, (2010). Green Economy: Driving the Green Economy through Public Finance and Fiscal Policy Reform. UNEP, Nairobi. H. T. Ngoc, N. T. Anh 45.
103.
UNEP, (2011), Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication, www.unep.org/greeneconomy.
105.
UNIDO, (2012). Toward Green Growth through Green Industry Development in Vietnam. http://www.unido. org/fileadmin/user_media_upgrade/Worldwide/Offices/ASIA_and_PACIFIC/vn_Green_Growth_ Through_Green_Industry_Development_in_VietNam_June2012.pdf [2].
106.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2011). Towards a GREEN Economy. Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. A Synthesis for Policy Makers. Accessed on 8 January 2018 at: https: //sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/126GER_synthesis_en.pdf ().
107.
United Nations, (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. http://www. un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E.
108.
Velenturf, A.P.M., Archer, S.A., Gomes, H.I., Christgen, B., Lag-Brotons, A.J., Purnell, P., (2019). Circular economy and the matter of integrated resources. Sci. Total Environ. 689, 963–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. scitotenv.2019.06.449.
109.
Wang, Y., Zhi, Q. (2016). The Role of Green Finance in Environmental Protection: Two Aspects of Market Mechanism and Policies, Energy Procedia 104, 311–316. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.053
110.
Watson, M. (2006). Protecting the Environment: The Role of Environmental Management Systems. J. R. Soc. Promot. Health, 126, 280–284.
111.
World Bank, (2019). Tanzania 2019: Country Environmental Analysis. Environmental Trends and Threats, and Pathways to Improved Sustainability, Washington, DC: World Bank.
112.
Xie, T., .Liu, J. (2019). How does Green Credit Affect China’s Green Economic Growth? China Popul. Resour. Environ. 29(09), 83–90. doi:10.12062/cpre.20190501.
113.
Yan, D., Kong, Y., Ren, X., Shi, Y., Chiang, S. (2019). The determinants of urban sustainability in Chinese resource-based cities: A panel quantile regression approach. Sci. Total Environ., 686, 1210–1219.
114.
Yan, D., Ren, X., Kong, Y., Ye, B., Liao, Z. (2020). The heterogeneous effects of socioeconomic determinants on PM2.5 concentrations using a two-step panel quantile regression. Appl. Energy, 272, 115246.
115.
Yang, H., ,Jiang, L. (2021). Digital Economy, Spatial Effect and Total Factor Productivity. Stat. Res. 38(04), 3–15. doi:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2021.04.001.
116.
Zhang, F. (2017). Theoretical and Empirical Research on the Influence of Financial Development on Green Total Factor Productivity. China Soft Sci. 32(09), 154–167.
117.
Zhao, Y., Peng, B., Elahi, E., Wan, A. (2021). Does The Extended Producer Responsibility System Promote the Green Technological Innovation of Enterprises? An Empirical Study Based on the Difference-in-Differences Model. J. Clean. Prod. 319 (128631). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128631.
118.
Ziegler, A. (2017). Economic Calculus or Personal and Social Values? A Micro-Econometric Analysis of the Acceptance of Climate and Energy Policy Measures; MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics. Marburg, Germany: Philipps University Marburg, School of Business and Economics.
| eISSN: | 2451-182X |
| ISSN: | 2083-3725 |
Digitalization of Economic and Regional Studies/ Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne – task financed under the agreement No. 819/P-DUN/2018 by the Minister of Science and Higher Education allocated to the activities of disseminating science.
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
